2026 Affordability Data
Most Affordable Neighborhoods in Mapleton - 2026 Data
The median home value in Mapleton is $656,200, 133% above nat'l avg. Median rent is $2,230/month. With an affordability index of 109, Mapleton is more affordable than the national baseline of 100. We ranked 15 neighborhoods by affordability to help you find the best value in the Mapleton, UT area.
Key Takeaways: Affordability in Mapleton
- 1The most affordable neighborhood in Mapleton is Riverdale, with a median home value of $316,500.
- 2Mapleton's median home value is $656,200, 133% above nat'l avg (national: $281,900).
- 3Mapleton's affordability index is 109 (baseline 100), making it more affordable than the national average.
- 4Median rent in Mapleton is $2,230/month, 92% above nat'l avg (national: $1,163/month).
- 5We analyzed 15 neighborhoods in Mapleton to find the most affordable areas based on home values, rent, and affordability index.
Mapleton Affordability Overview
Median Home Value
$656,200
133% above nat'l avg
Median Rent
$2,230/mo
92% above nat'l avg
Median Income
$123,534
66% above nat'l avg
Affordability Index
109
9% above nat'l avg
Most Affordable Neighborhoods in Mapleton (Ranked)
| Rank | Neighborhood | Median Home Value |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | RiverdaleUT | $316,500 |
| 2 | Washington TerraceUT | $301,900 |
| 3 | Saratoga SpringsUT | $490,600 |
| 4 | West Valley CityUT | $333,600 |
| 5 | SalemUT | $468,100 |
| 6 | South JordanUT | $559,500 |
| 7 | GrantsvilleUT | $377,000 |
| 8 | LehiUT | $500,100 |
| 9 | VineyardUT | $481,800 |
| 10 | LindonUT | $598,900 |
| 11 | TaylorsvilleUT | $358,900 |
| 12 | HerrimanUT | $486,200 |
| 13 | LoganUT | $290,800 |
| 14 | DraperUT | $663,400 |
| 15 | MurrayUT | $415,700 |
Detailed Neighborhood Profiles
Home Value: $316,500
Rent: $1,854/mo
Affordability: 125
Population: 9,313
Home Value: $301,900
Rent: $1,854/mo
Affordability: 125
Population: 9,220
Home Value: $490,600
Rent: $2,230/mo
Affordability: 109
Population: 40,391
4
Home Value: $333,600
Rent: $2,230/mo
Affordability: 109
Population: 138,868
5
Home Value: $468,100
Rent: $2,230/mo
Affordability: 109
Population: 9,467
6
Home Value: $559,500
Rent: $2,230/mo
Affordability: 109
Population: 78,118
7
Home Value: $377,000
Rent: $2,230/mo
Affordability: 109
Population: 12,939
8
Home Value: $500,100
Rent: $2,230/mo
Affordability: 109
Population: 77,110
9
Home Value: $481,800
Rent: $2,230/mo
Affordability: 109
Population: 12,663
10
Home Value: $598,900
Rent: $2,230/mo
Affordability: 109
Population: 11,478
11
Home Value: $358,900
Rent: $2,230/mo
Affordability: 109
Population: 59,729
12
Home Value: $486,200
Rent: $2,230/mo
Affordability: 109
Population: 55,301
13
Home Value: $290,800
Rent: $2,230/mo
Affordability: 109
Population: 53,246
14
Home Value: $663,400
Rent: $2,230/mo
Affordability: 109
Population: 50,635
15
Home Value: $415,700
Rent: $2,230/mo
Affordability: 109
Population: 50,041
Frequently Asked Questions About Affordability in Mapleton
What is the most affordable neighborhood in Mapleton, UT?▾
Based on 2026 data, Riverdale is the most affordable neighborhood in Mapleton with a median home value of $316,500. Kurby analyzed 15 neighborhoods in the Mapleton area to compile these rankings.
What is the median home price in Mapleton, UT?▾
The median home price in Mapleton is $656,200, which is 133% above nat'l avg. The national median home value is $281,900 (Source: Kurby, 2026).
Is Mapleton affordable compared to the national average?▾
Mapleton has an affordability index of 109, which means housing is more affordable than the national baseline of 100. An index above 100 indicates that a median-income household can afford a median-priced home in the area.
What is the average rent in Mapleton, UT?▾
The median monthly rent in Mapleton is $2,230. This is 92% above nat'l avg. The national median rent is $1,163/month (Source: Kurby, 2026).
What is the median household income in Mapleton?▾
The median household income in Mapleton is $123,534 compared to the national median of $74,580. This metric is important for understanding housing affordability in relation to local earning power (Source: Kurby, 2026).